Home Store In Memoriam Deborah Newsletter Forum Topics Blogfeed Blogroll Facebook MySpace Contact Us About

O'Reilly, Manzi & Laksin - Three Losers Attack Media Matters

Reported by Marie Therese - October 26, 2005

In the "how low will Bill go" segment on last night's O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly did his usual ritual courtship dance with two like-minded, rabid conservatives - Jakob Laksin, an editor and writer for David Horowitz's neo-fascist rag, FrontPage Magazine, and Todd Manzi, journalist and contributor to Human Events Online. In the process it became obvious why he targeted Macarena Hernandez last week. In the course of last night's hate-fest, he used his trumped-up claims against Hernandez and the Dallas Morning News as the justification for virulent attack on Media Matters, MoveOn.org and George Soros. Welcome to the twilight world of right-wing delusion! Watching these three jokers trying to make a story out of whole cloth was, actually, quite funny. They are grabbing at the ghosts of straws these days!

TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW, BILL O' REILLY, TODD MANZI AND JACOB LAKSIN
October 25, 2005 The O'Reilly Factor

O'REILLY: In the Factor investigation segment tonight, if you can't beat 'em, smear 'em. Far-left billionaires George Soros and Peter Lewis, who heads the Progressive Insurance Company - remember that. If you have Progressive Insurance, you may want to look elsewhere.

[COMMENT: O'Reilly neglected to mention that a Director of the Progressive Insurance Company, Donald Shackelford, donated $25,000 to the RNC and $2,000 to the Bush campaign. Progressive is one of a number of insurance companies that find themselves with a heavy exposure in Florida's hurricane belt. Bill O'Reilly asked his viewers to cancel their automotive coverage, thereby advocating - FOR VENGEANCE REASONS ONLY - that customers weaken the bottom line of a company that carries policies in a badly ravaged state. This guy's ego knows no bounds!]

O'REILLY: Those guys have poured tens of millions of dollars into political organizations designed to harm people with whom the left disagrees. For example, Soros and Lewis have each donated two and a half million dollars at least to MoveOn.org, which is a relentless liberal attack machine. Now, all of this would be of minor concern, if the major media were not involved. But, the Factor has learned that a number of newspaper columnists and TV and radio commentators take information fed to them by the far-left organizations and use it as primary source material. That is, they don't check anything, they just throw the propaganda out there in print or on the air.

Example, Macarena Hernandez. quoting a Radio Factor transcript out of context. We believe she took it off Media Matters, which tapes us every day. Example, Bill Bennett being crucified by the elite media which used smear website information. With us now, Jacob Laksin, editor and writer for FrontPage Magazine, a conservative publication and from Madison, Wisconsin, journalist Todd Manzi, who looked into the Bill Bennett matter. How did the Bennett thing go down? What did you learn?

MANZI: Well, Media Matters taped Bill - one of Bill Bennett's phone calls. A caller had it in.

[COMMENT: Manzi, knowing that he hasn't got a leg to stand on, deliberately doesn't mention that this call is the infamous one in which Bennett hypothesized that crime would be reduced if you aborted all the black babies]

MANZI: Nothin' there at all. They decided that they wanted to make an issue out of that, so they put the transcript up with an incendiary headline. And, then all of a sudden, the usual suspects from the left started issuing press releases. Harry Reid issued a press release. John Conyers. The NAACP. They all issued, issued press releases. The interesting thing for me, though, is there was no story yet. Bennett's phone call occurred on a Wednesday. Media Matters put him up on a Wednesday. On Thursday all these people issued press releases and then the AP finally filed a story Thursday night.

O'REILLY: Alright.

MANZI: So they made a story out of nothin'.

O'REILLY: So, well, that's what they always do. They tape the Radio Factor. They tape Rush Limbaugh. They tape Bill Bennett and they look to see if they can find something that - to smear us with. So, what you're saying is that they contacted Harry Reid, the Minority Senate Leader. They contacted the NAACP. Of course, these people don't listen to Bill Bennett's radio program. So, they just took it right from Media Matters, and then ran with it in an accusatory style, the AP picked it up, put it in the paper and then Bennett gets crucified. Correct?

MANZI: Yeah. It's in, it's in hundreds of newspapers, hundreds of television stations, all over and i's just because ...

O'REILLY: Now, is the AP at fault here, in your opinion?

MANZI: Yes. The AP is absolutely at fault. Yes. The AP is running and considering this news. The AP has misinformed millions of people that now have the wrong impression about what happened.

O'REILLY (overtalks last 6 words): Well, how did - how did they misinform, though? I mean, the controversy over Bennett's remarks has been over and over and over and we - as we pointed out, I don't think there was any malicious intent in the remark. It was an analogy. But you don't generalize about race in this country. But, why did the AP misinform? How did they do that?

MANZI: Well, it gets to the matter of what is news. News is the who, what, why, where, right? I mean the news and the matter - if you distill it down to its, its fundamental point - is that Bill Bennett argued that abortion should be, be debated on moral issues rather than economic issues. That's not news. The news that the AP went with is that Harry Reid was offended. That's not news either. Harry Reid's offended at almost everything. That's what they put out there. What people took away from that was a position that they attributed to Bennett. They were misinformed about what actually happened ...

O'REILLY: OK.

MANZI: ... what the intent was.

O'REILLY: Now.

MANZI: Anyone who listened to the call ...

O'REILLY: Right. If you listen to the call - and we urge people to do that - you can make up your own mind on the matter. Now, the bigger picture here. You've got two primary billionaires. You've got Soros, who has his money in Curacao, by the way, ladies and gentlemen. Curacao. That's where he's got his money. And Lewis. And they are pumpin' money into these organizations - primarily MoveOn.org, which it then recycles the money into Media Matters and other places, to destroy, I mean, literally, destroy people. Is that what's goin' on here?

LAKSIN: Well, it's very crafty what they've done, Bill. They've created sort of, [an] underground network which funnels donations from wealthy donors like Lewis and Soros to these 527 groups - which 527's they're called because they operate under a certain section of the tax code, and that allows them to collect an unlimited number of contributions and then funnel them to a variety of political causes. And that's perfect for Soros, because, of course, he has his own far left agenda and he moves it very expediently through these 527's and, of course, Media Matters benefits, because they - it receives, like you said, funding from a number of these 527 groups.

O'REILLY: I mean, it gets millions of dollars - more than $3 million last year into this little website - coming primarily from these people and other people like Susie Tompkins Buell, the co-founder of the fashion giant, Esprit. But all of these people are far left fringe players. But they know their money's goin' to smear merchants. They know it's goin' into character assassins, correct?

LAKSIN: It's actually interesting, because that's exactly what it's meant for. In fact, one of the bigger contributors to Media Matters is the Center for American Progress. That's a think - liberal think tank.

O'REILLY: That's Podesta's group, right?

LAKSIN: Exactly. And they operate out of Washington, DC, and basically what it is, it's a - it's a partisan group that's - what they do is rapid response anything that they - that offends them as far a Republican or conservative agenda's concerned, which is just about everything. And, so, Media Matters operates in exactly the same way, except where the media in concerned. So, it's perfect.

O'REILLY: Right. It is a very well-oiled, effective character assassination machine. There's nothing that exists on the right that I know of that can compare. Do you know of anything?

LAKSIN: No. And one reason is because the right-wing publications have been very effective at getting out their message. They don't need to smear. They can just present the facts as they are.

O'REILLY (overtalks last 5 words): Well, there was some smearing going on in the Clinton years, to be fair. Now, Todd, one more thing. Here's a name of, of - here are some names of mainstream journalists who take stuff directly from the left-wing smear sites: Paul Krugman, New York times columnist; Jack Mathews, New York Daily News columnist; the afore-mentioned Miss [Macarena] Hernandez; Alan Dershowitz, the left-wing lawyer at Harvard; Maureen Dowd, another New York Times columnist; Frank Rich, another New York Times columnist. Um - it just goes on and on that these people are fed this kind of stuff and then it gets in, as you said, into the mainstream media and blows up everywhere. Are these people doing anything morally wrong in your opinion?

MANZI: Yeah. The issue is whether we should be talkin' about this at all. They're - they're running with that for the sole purpose of smearing Bennett. It's not about the issue. It's not about moving forward the ideas. You know, like was just said by your other guest, the conservatives, when we write, we write about issues and ideas. We don't write just to smear people.

O'REILLY: Well, we're gonna have a conservative website guy on tomorrow and we're gonna ask him the same questions and see if that's the case. But, this is a very, very insidious, well-organized, damaging to America deal and everybody should know about it. Thank you, gentlemen. We appreciate it very much.

COMMENT

Here are just a few of the "classy" articles these guys and their ilk have written.

FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE

October 25, 2005
Tom Hayden's Iraqi Jihad
Jacob Laksin

[Tom] Hayden’s efforts in today’s antiwar movement are no surprise, of course; they are simply part of his life-long personal vendetta against America – and his die-hard support of its totalitarian and terrorist enemies. In the late Sixties, it was Hayden who spearheaded the antiwar campaign that eventually forced America's withdrawal from Vietnam, which, in turn, facilitated the bloodbath that followed in Southeast Asia. As unsparing in his attacks on America as he was effusive in his praise for Communist North Vietnam—after a visit to Hanoi, Hayden insisted that he had seen the “rice roots democracy at work”—he could claim a share of the credit for the American withdrawal that sealed the doom of 2.5 million people.

To his dogmatic faith in the inherent injustice of the American enterprise, Hayden has always stayed true. Having witnessed the disaster occasioned by the American pullout from Vietnam, Hayden is now bent on repeating the same horrifying scenario in Iraq.

October 25, 2005
Fascist attack in Hollywood. Racism on the left. Raving lunatic to attack White House
David Horowitz

It is probably more accurate to say it is the first conservative film festival in Hollywood since the Sixties reds took over the asylum and polluted the awards ceremonies and professional fairs with their retro politics and spontaneous displays of stupidity chic. When conservatives ran Hollywood, the town had class.

This is the second year of the Liberty Film Festival which had sold 3,000 tickets as of Friday. I was there to introduce Evan Coyne Maloney's brilliant documentary "Brainwashing 201" which demonstrates how a brain dead radical left has polluted the academy and intellectually debased the greatest university system the world has ever known.

HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE

October 24, 2005
Hoping for U.S. Casualties
Todd Manzi

Neal Boortz makes the case that the anti-war left is rooting for our soldiers to die. Cindy Sheehan needs to have four more soldiers killed so she can put her next plan into action. Sick.

October 18, 2005
The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy: Attack on Bill Bennett Was Staged
Todd Manzi

The travesty is that we’re even talking about this at all. The most abhorrent behavior that occurred regarding this issue came from the Associated Press (AP). Allowing news hit men like John Conyers, Bruce Gordon, Ralph Neas, Howard Dean and many elected Democrats to assault Bill Bennett is detestable and the AP should be held accountable. The only way liberal Democrats can win is by fighting without honor and by perpetrating hideous attacks on innocent citizens.

RUSH LIMBAUGH

September 19, 2005

LIMBAUGH: She [Sheehan] had, she had tough words for the military, the Bush administration, and even Democratic liberals such as Hillary Rodham [sic], whom she said voters should "reject" if she fails to toughen her stance against the war. She said, "We have to stop making war profitable."

She also took issue with the media, which she said has spent more time scrutinizing her past than Bush's policies. The woman's clearly deranged, and I say that not because of the statement about the media but daring to criticize Hillary. If she's not careful -- let me, let me just make you a prediction: If she calls Hillary out one more time -- one more time -- you are never going to see the words "Cindy Sheehan" in the U.S. media ever again.

I will guarantee you she's already had the talking-to. Somebody has gotten to her and said, "Do the words 'Fort Marcy Park' mean anything to you?" I will guarantee you, my friends, that by the time all is said and done -- if she calls her out one more time -- that's it for Cindy Sheehan. No matter how hard you try, you will not be able to find her name except on some extremist, kook, left-wing blog.

But you won't find it anywhere in the mainstream press. You just don't do this. You don't call out Hillary Rodham Clinton. You don't call out a Clinton like this. Not, not when you're supposedly on their side.

[Fort Marcy Park was where Vince Foster was found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. However, Limbaugh and others claim Foster was murdered by the Clintons.]

STATEMENT BY THE FOUNDER OF FREE REPUBLIC
(This pretty much puts the kibosh on everything said above)

In our continuing fight for freedom, for America and our constitution and against totalitarianism, socialism, tyranny, terrorism, etc., Free Republic stands firmly on the side of right, i.e., the conservative side. Believing that the best defense is a strong offense, we (myself and those whom I'm trying to attract to FR) support the strategy of taking the fight to the enemy as opposed to allowing the enemy the luxury of conducting their attacks on us at home on their terms and on their schedule.

Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security. We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency. We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.

Free Republic is private property. It is not a government project, nor is it funded by government or taxpayer money. We are not a publicly owned entity nor are we an IRS tax-free non-profit organization. We pay all applicable taxes on our income. We are not connected to or funded by any political party, news agency, or any other entity. We sell no merchandise, product or service, and we offer no subscriptions or paid memberships. We accept no paid advertising or promotions. We are funded solely by donations (non tax deductible gifts) from our readers and participants.

We aggressively defend our God-given and first amendment guaranteed rights to free speech, free press, free religion, and freedom of association, as well as our constitutional right to control the use and content of our own personal private property. Despite the wailing of the liberal trolls and other doom & gloom naysayers, we feel no compelling need to allow them a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is not a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists dedicated to defending our rights, defending our constitution, defending our republic and defending our traditional American way of life.

Our God-given liberty and freedoms are not negotiable.

May God bless and protect our men and women in uniform fighting for our freedom and may God continue to bless America.

Jim Robinson

N. B. Just above Robinson's statement, Free Republic makes the following announcement:

FReeper Stuff Merchandise FReeper Stuff is back!
Buy gifts for family and friends, show off your FR items to your liberal office mates, or attend a freep in the hottest FRashion. BBQ the Libs (metaphorically, of course) in your Free Republic apron!

Click the Pajama Patrol Badge to view FReeper Stuff!

(FReeper Stuff is an independent and separate organization and is not owned or controlled by Free Republic, LLC)


Comments
Post a comment




Remember Me?


We welcome your opinions and viewpoints. Comments must remain civil, on-topic and must not violate any copyright or other laws. We reserve the right to delete any comments we deem inappropriate or non-constructive to the discussion for any reason, and to block any commenter for repeated violations.

Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.